lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070130204839.4124e9f3.mikeserv@bmts.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:48:39 -0500
From:	Mike Houston <mikeserv@...s.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How many people are using 2.6.16?

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:52:15 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:

> > I've been using Adrian's 2.6.16 kernel releases on two internet
> > servers that I look after remotely. One of them is RHEL 4 the
> > other is Fedora Core 2 (Ensim Webppliance). I'm especially wary
> > of breaking RHEL 4, and the 2.6.16.xx kernels work perfectly
> > except for the hald not starting (but that doesn't matter on that
> > server).
> >...
> 
> I haven't heard of this before, and in a quick test hald from
> HAL 0.5.8.1 starts fine here.
> 
> Are there any error messages?
>

I think I recall hearing about hald breaking in rhel4 with modern
kernels here on this list, some time before I built a custom kernel
for that rig (Athlon 64 3200+ on Asus A8V w' VIA K8T800Pro chipset
running 32 bit RHEL 4 ES). I was expecting it to happen. I think at
the time, the current kernel was 2.6.15.2 or thereabouts.

However, I haven't upgraded any software that's in the distro packages
beyond what up2date provides, so:

$ rpm -qa | grep hal
hal-0.4.2-4.EL4

So sorry about that, I didn't mean to take up any of your time. I
only mentioned it incidentally and wasn't expecting it to be
addressed. (I was more happily stating that nothing of significance
to me is broken in the distro). If that was something I needed, I
would have looked into upgrading it.

Mike Houston
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ