linux-kernel - Re: Free Linux Driver Development!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:34:38 +1000
From:	"Trent Waddington" <trent.waddington@...il.com>
To:	"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@...il.com>
Cc:	"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Free Linux Driver Development!

On 2/1/07, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@...il.com> wrote:
> Not all of them.
> It seems it's kosher to rewrite a corp GPL driver but not a "community" one.

As I said, Greg didn't say it was rude to write a new driver without consulting
the author of an existing driver.. corp *or* community.. so who said
it was?  You can rewrite whatever you feel like rewriting.  Greg was
talking about what is polite usage of someone elses code.  In
particular, doing stuff they've specifically said they don't want you
to do with it is rude.

>From a practical standpoint it makes sense, I think: the guy who wrote
the code is often the best person to maintain it, so don't piss him
off.  If you want to rewrite it, then you would be the guy offering to
maintain it..

Trent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/