linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070131162631.4ae5800d.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:31 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	PaweÅ Sikora <pluto@...k.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Martin Peschke <mp3@...ibm.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc7

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> I should either revert that commit or just check for "free_pages" being 
> negative. The latter, in many ways, is probably better, because generally 
> we simply should never work with negative numbers in the kernel, so when 
> something potentially goes negative, we're probably just better off always 
> testing it explicitly anyway.
> 
> Nick, Andrew, any preferences? 

It would be cleaner to check for negativity, but note that we keep
subtracting stuff from free_pages in the later loop, so we'd need to check
there as well.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/