linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-rc6 ramdisk problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1170290408.29240.252.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:40:08 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc:	michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6 ramdisk problem

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 18:14 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > So either #1 or #2 should have failed in the first place. Failing in #3
> > is definitely a BUG in #1 or #2.
> > 
> > How does your advise help to fix that BUG ? Ignoring it by using
> > something else ?
> 
> Yes, there is likely a bug here of some sort. However, that doesn't 
> change the fact that ramdisks are sub-optimal for most uses.

You still did not answer my question: 
How does this deep insight help us to track down that BUG ?

Michal is actively testing the kernel and provides extremly useful
information about problems. He pointed out a bug and we want to fix it.
Adding special instructions, which are appropriate for a LUG
mailinglist, does us not get any further.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/