linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/9] x86_64: reliable TSC-based gettimeofday

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:52:43 +0100
From:	Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	jbohac@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>, ssouhlal@...ebsd.org,
	arjan@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, johnstul@...ibm.com,
	zippel@...ux-m68k.org, andrea@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] x86_64: reliable TSC-based gettimeofday

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:59PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 10:59, jbohac@...e.cz wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Inter-CPU monotonicity can not, however, be guaranteed in a vsyscall, so
> > vsyscall is not used by default.
> 
> Only for unsynchronized machines I hope 

yes, sorry, only on unsynchronized machines

> The big strategic problem is how to marry your patchkit to John Stultz's
> clocksources work which is also competing for merge. Any thoughts on that? 

I'll look into that next week. Sorry, I wanted to do that a long time
ago, but I spent weeks (over a month) fighting a nasty livelock
in the code. (Morale: think twice before using a spinlock inside
                      a {do .. while (read_seqretry(..))} loop)

> >When strict inter-CPU monotonicity is not needed, the vsyscall version of
> >gettimeofday may be forced using the "nomonotonic" command line parameter.
> >gettimeofday()'s monotonicity is guaranteed on a single CPU even with the very
> >fast vsyscall version.  Across CPUs, the vsyscall version of gettimeofday is
> >not guaranteed to be monotonic, but it should be pretty close. Currently, we
> >get errors of tens/hundreds of microseconds.
> 
> I think a better way to do this would be to define a new CLOCK_THREAD_MONOTONOUS
> (or better name) timer for clock_gettime(). 

I absolutely agree. Will do that. This should give userspace a
decently accurate and very fast time source.

-- 
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/