[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702011520.46723.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:20:45 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: rth@...ddle.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alpha@...too.org
Subject: epoll handling in the alpha port
the alpha linux port differs from all others when it comes to the epoll
functions in that it uses '__NR_sys_epoll_XXX' instead of '__NR_epoll_XXX' in
the asm/unistd.h header ... the trouble with this is that glibc maps the
function name directly to an __NR_ define, so when it maps
like 'epoll_create', it expects '__NR_epoll_create' (which it gets with all
other architectures)
is there some obvious thing i'm missing here ? or is the attached patch OK ?
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
---
--- a/include/asm-alpha/unistd.h
+++ b/include/asm-alpha/unistd.h
@@ -342,9 +342,9 @@
#define __NR_io_cancel 402
#define __NR_exit_group 405
#define __NR_lookup_dcookie 406
-#define __NR_sys_epoll_create 407
-#define __NR_sys_epoll_ctl 408
-#define __NR_sys_epoll_wait 409
+#define __NR_epoll_create 407
+#define __NR_epoll_ctl 408
+#define __NR_epoll_wait 409
#define __NR_remap_file_pages 410
#define __NR_set_tid_address 411
#define __NR_restart_syscall 412
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists