[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C25628.9060100@mbligh.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:05:44 -0800
From: mbligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: jbohac@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>, ssouhlal@...ebsd.org,
arjan@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, johnstul@...ibm.com,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, andrea@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] Remove the TSC synchronization on SMP machines
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 10:59, jbohac@...e.cz wrote:
>> TSC is either synchronized by design or not reliable
>> to be used for anything, let alone timekeeping.
>
> In my tree this is already done better by a patch from Ingo.
> Check if they look synchronized and don't use TSC if they are not.
Is it going to notice dynamically when one cpu ramps down/up
during runtime, and looses sync?
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists