[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C27908.1000202@foo-projects.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:34:32 -0800
From: Auke Kok <sofar@...-projects.org>
To: Trent Waddington <trent.waddington@...il.com>
CC: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Trent Waddington wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org> wrote:
>> Ok. I totally dig the *idea* here - I mean, this issue has been ongoing
>> for a long time now. But I'd like to see a few comments as to whether we
>> need a technological mechanism here to enforce the obvious. To me, it
>> just seems totally obvious (any legal comment?) that early C string
>> termination is undermining the intent of the MODULE_LICENSE tag.
>
> I'm not a lawyer, but I can tell you exactly what a lawyer would say:
>
> "well, ya know, it's hard to say when it comes to these issues"
>
> that's the answer to *any* copyright question. :)
to me it even screams "bypassing or a digital copyright enforcement system".
that sounds really close to "D.M.C.A. violation" :)
thank goodness I'm not a laywer...
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists