linux-kernel - Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:28:07 -0500
From:	"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To:	"Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libc-hacker@...rces.redhat.com,
	libc-alpha@...rces.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

On 1/29/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:
> 1. Scheduling fairness.
> Since kernel does not know about multiple threads behind given process,
> it can not add it appropriate number of timeslices for execution.
> Can be solved either by more tight collaboarion of the userspace and
> kernelspace schedulers or simply by increasing process' nice value.

nice value is only meaningful for SCHED_OTHER.  How will you handle a
multithreaded realtime application that uses SCHED_OTHER as well as
SCHED_FIFO threads?

Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/