lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:44:44 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: "S.ÃaÄlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Mark Huang <mlhuang@...Princeton.EDU>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, S.ÃaÄlar Onur wrote: >> I think i found the cause of the problem, initramfs can't handle hardlinks >> anymore (which works with 2.6.18), copying same /sbin/busybox binary with >> different names into initramfs (which ends ups with 50 MB image) or using >> symbolic ones instead of hards seems works. > > Ok, it would still be interesting to hear what triggered this. > It would be interesting to know what the inode numbers are in the image; also, what is the exact behaviour -- do you end up with a missing link, or do both entries end up getting hard-linked to an empty file? -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists