[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 22:27:41 +0100
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] APM-EMULATION: apm_get_power_status() should be NULL on init [was: Advice on battery support]
APM-EMULATION: apm_get_power_status() should be NULL on init.
Signed-off-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
---
If the function apm_get_info() do like this:
static int apm_get_info(char *buf, char **start, off_t fpos, int length)
{
struct apm_power_info info;
char *units;
int ret;
info.ac_line_status = 0xff;
info.battery_status = 0xff;
info.battery_flag = 0xff;
info.battery_life = -1;
info.time = -1;
info.units = -1;
if (apm_get_power_status)
apm_get_power_status(&info);
...
we shouldn't set:
static void __apm_get_power_status(struct apm_power_info *info)
{
}
void (*apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info *) = __apm_get_power_status;
otherwise the check is not needed. Furthermore setting the function to
NULL signals that the apm-emulation layer is not already assigned (I
found this very useful for my apm-emulation battery_class support).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists