[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:15:54 -0500
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Trent Waddington <trent.waddington@...il.com>,
Tomas Carnecky <tom@...ervice.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> But you're right, the MODULE_LICENSE tag really does imply that
>> licenses other than the GPL are ok.
>
> yup.. BSD licensed modules are clearly ok as well..
So I guess we're going to go with Jan's change then.
I just wanted to discuss this briefly since I'm very keen for the kernel
not to enforce legal/DRM type policy at all - this isn't quite the same
discussion as we've had previously but the point remains: it should be
for people to realize when they are violating a license as software
unfortunately cannot ever be intelligent to catch all the baddies.
Personally, I am less worried if people use an obvious "PROPRIETARY"
label because they're at least admitting and saying it how it is - then
if later it can be shown that they are in fact violating kernel
copyright, they've helped to sign their own death warrant :-)
Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists