[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:05:15 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ssouhlal@...ebsd.org, arjan@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
johnstul@...ibm.com, zippel@...ux-m68k.org, andrea@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] Make use of the Master Timer
> > Hmm, I wasn't sure. Why is it needed? How outdated can the
> > result of RDTSC / RDTSCP be?
> >
> > If I do:
> > rdtscll(a)
> > ...
> > rdtscll(b)
> > is it guaranteed that (b > a) ?
>
> On a single CPU this is always guaranteed. Even on AMD.
It's not guaranteed on Intel at least (but happens to work on P4)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists