[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170487929.3073.988.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:32:09 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com>,
Luigi Genoni <luigi.genoni@...elli.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 irq: Handle irqs pending in IRR during irq
migration.
> > Once the migration operation is complete we know we will receive
> > no more interrupts on this vector so the irq pending state for
> > this irq will no longer be updated. If the irq is not pending and
> > we are in the intermediate state we immediately free the vector,
> > otherwise in we free the vector in do_IRQ when the pending irq
> > arrives.
>
> So is this a for-2.6.20 thing? The bug was present in 2.6.19, so
> I assume it doesn't affect many people?
I got a few reports of this; irqbalance may trigger this kernel bug it
seems... I would suggest to consider this for 2.6.20 since it's a
hard-hang case
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists