[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702031058.13830.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:58:13 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:49, Frédéric Riss wrote:
> Was what I did in the initial patch:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/30/258
>
> The issue is that the structure definition is used on multiple
> architectures (for now ia64 and i386) which might used different calling
> conventions. As Bjorn Helgaas pointed out, ia64 already has such wrapper
> functions. I agree that the casting isn't the nicest thing, but I prefer
> that to writing asm stubs.
Define a efilinkage macro then that expands to nothing on ia64
Probably asmlinkage would work already, syscall_linkage as used on ia64 doesn't
seem to affect function pointers.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists