[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702031236340.27840@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 12:38:47 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string
termination trick
On Feb 3 2007 08:14, Russell King wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:08:14AM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>> This patch changes the module license handling code to:
>> - prevent the "GPL\0 for nothing"-trick
>
>You can achieve this effect without changing the existing module
>format, and it's far more difficult to bypass with build-with-
>modified module.h tricks.
>
>+static int check_modinfo_objects(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>+ unsigned int symindex,
>+ unsigned int infoindex)
>+{
>+ unsigned int i;
>+ Elf_Sym *sym = (void *)sechdrs[symindex].sh_addr;
>+ char *info = (char *)sechdrs[infoindex].sh_addr;
>+
>+ for (i = 1; i < sechdrs[symindex].sh_size/sizeof(*sym); i++) {
>+ if (sym[i].st_shndx == infoindex &&
>+ ELF_ST_TYPE(sym[i].st_info) == STT_OBJECT) {
>+ if (strlen(info + sym[i].st_value) + 1 != sym[i].st_size)
>+ return -ENOEXEC;
>+ }
>+ }
What happens when there is no symbol for the "license=GPL\0foo..." string?
To me it looks like we'll miss it.
Jan
--
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists