linux-kernel - Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1170516376.3073.1015.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:26:16 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha
	release.


> Because user threading can avoid context switches, there will always be 
> cases where it will outperform o/s threads for hardware reasons.

actually.. switching from one "real" thread to another in Linux is not
an actual context switch in the hardware sense... at least this part of
your argument seems to be incorrect ;)

> 
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/