[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702041027460.8424@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:29:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frédéric Riss <frederic.riss@...il.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Frédéric Riss wrote:
>
> I think Andi said that adding asmlinkage on the function pointers
> shouldn't harm ia64. If you prefer wrapper functions, one of the patches
> I sent ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/30/309 ) did that, but the casting
> it uses looks clumsy.
I'm more comfortable with that one, at least for now. It's guaranteed to
not break ia64, at least. Also, it does what I think is right: do the
calling convention conversion at the call-site rather than at a C compiler
level.
Will apply a whitespace-fixed version,
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists