linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <006401c74834$8f927d70$2101a8c0@donald>
Date:	Sun, 4 Feb 2007 09:14:57 +0100
From:	"Paul Rolland" <rol@...917.net>
To:	"'Jan Engelhardt'" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...l.org>,
	"'Jon Masters'" <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	"'Alexey Dobriyan'" <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick

> So what (legally) happens when someone does
> MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE(2), (~0) or (-1)? Does the judge 
> get confused?
> Then better use strings and an appropriate check.

Please let me not believe it's not possible to have a compilation test
on that that would issue a #error if param is not one of the acceptable
value...

Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/