[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702050931430.26272@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:33:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tracking mlocked pages and moving them off the LRU
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > I still need a solution for the problem of not having enough page flag
> > bits on i386 NUMA.
>
> I still don't get why you *really* need such a bit.
Because otherwise you cannot establish why a page was removed from the
LRU. If a page is off the LRU for other reasons then one should not
return the page to the LRU in zap_pte_range. How can this determination
be made without a page flag?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists