[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C6D2C1.5010103@xman.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:46:25 -0800
From: Christopher Smith <x@...n.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC: bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: regarding generic AIO, async syscalls precedent + some benchmarks
by lighttpd
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Yes, that is some very interesting data IMO. I did not bench the GUASI
> (userspace async thread library) against AIO, but those numbers show that a
> *userspace* async syscall wrapper interface performs in the ballpark of AIO.
> This leads to some hope about the ability to effectively deploy the kernel
> generic async AIO (being it fibril or kthreads based) as low-impact async
> provider for basically anything.
>
SGI's kaio patch to linux kind of went that route (using kthreads) for
non-SCSI async IO. It wasn't a bad way to go, but at least for
disk-based access they achieved much better results when they could go
right to the hardware.
--Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists