linux-kernel - Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45C7C509.6090009@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:00:09 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I also feel that a lot of people are "advanced" in one area, but not 
> necessarily in another. The Netfilter example I gave was one such personal 
> gripe of mine. I just feel like I shouldn't need to care! Yeah, I have the 
> knowledge, but I *still* want to be baby-fed with just a simple "anybody 
> can understand it".

It's a good example.  I had a bear of a time with the netfilter kernel 
config on my firewall (w/ IPv6 goodness) box, when the generic netfilter 
stuff landed.  For the first time in a long time, that firewall booted 
into a configuration that wouldn't forward+masq packets properly.

> The same is true of the whole SATA/USB/SCSI thing. I know damn well that 
> the kernel uses the SCSI layer for USB and SATA, yet I feel that the ATA 
> layer does it right, and I just find the USB storage situation to be 
> *offensively* bad in this regard. Why the HELL does it have those big 
> comments and warnings, when it could just damn well enable SCSI support 
> itself?

I think maybe ATA is just lucky.  I allowed myself to get bullied into 
avoiding 'select', even though I feel the same way as you.

ATA should select scsi-disk but doesn't, for example.

And at some point it becomes a matter of taste:  should ATA select 
BLOCK, or depend on BLOCK?  There are IMO good arguments either way.

	Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/