[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170752856.7324.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:07:36 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] VMI / Paravirt bugfixes for 2.6.21
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:11 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:54 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Indeed, I'm expecting to push lguest this week, and this code will
> > > effect me, so I'd like to see this in a -mm soon...
> >
> > Yes, I took a look at the lguest changes today and I think these won't
> > generate conflicts, just make stuff easier for you ;) Course you've now
> > got a couple new paravirt-ops to support, but the native ones are fine
> > for temporary use.
>
> Implementing stolen time is something I'd like to do, since it'd be a
> nice self-contained example the expectations.
hmm stolen time could even be useful without virtualization; to a large
degree, if cpufreq reduces the speed of your cpu you have "stolen
cycles" that way... I wonder if this concept can be used for that as
well...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists