[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206004842.GS32307@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:48:42 -0800
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To: Scot McKinley <scot.mckinley@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:27:44PM -0800, Scot McKinley wrote:
> Finally, it is agreed that neg-errno is a much better approach for the
> return code. The threading/concurrency issues associated w/ the current
> unix errno has always been buggy area for Oracle Networking code.
As Scot knows, when Oracle started using the current io_submit(2)
and io_getevents(2), -errno was a big win.
Joel
--
"Born under a bad sign.
I been down since I began to crawl.
If it wasn't for bad luck,
I wouldn't have no luck at all."
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists