[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206161624.GI8665@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:16:24 +0100
From: "Andreas Herrmann" <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Suresh B Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Richard Gooch" <rgooch@...e-mbox.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] [patch] mtrr: fix issues with large addresses
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:31:45AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> 06.02.07 08:53 >>>
> >On Monday 05 February 2007 23:50, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:19:59PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> >> > o added check to restrict base address to 36 bit on i386
> >>
> >> Why is this? It can go upto implemented physical bits, right?
> >
> >In theory it can, but Linux doesn't support it.
>
> I don't think I remember a restriction here, at least not below 44 bits
> (that's where pfn-s would need to become 64-bit wide).
>
> Jan
>
Hi all,
shame on me.
Wanted to fix and interface issue where base address is truncated
at 44 bit in mtrr_write().
(And just thought 36 bit would be more than enough for that 32 bit
Linux version :)
Regards,
Andreas
--
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists