[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206164826.GA3491@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:48:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: dynticks + iptables almost stops the boot process [was: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3]
Mattia,
* Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it> wrote:
> > I have it halfways reproducible now and I'm working to find the root
> > cause. Thanks for providing the info.
>
> Great, I'm obviously available to test any patch :)
Could you try the patch below? The RCU serialization code (a rare call
but can be common in some types of setups) has a nasty implicit
dependency on the HZ tick - which until now was a hidden wart but became
an explicit bug under dynticks. Maybe this is what is slowing down your
box.
Ingo
------------------------->
Subject: [patch] dynticks: make sure synchronize_rcu() completes
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
synchronize_rcu() has a nasty implicit dependency on the HZ tick: it
relies on another CPU finishing all RCU work so that this CPU can finish
its RCU work too - in IRQ context. But wait_for_completion() goes to
sleep indefinitely on dynticks and there might be no other IRQs to this
CPU for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/rcupdate.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/rcupdate.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ linux/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -85,8 +85,13 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
/* Will wake me after RCU finished */
call_rcu(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
- /* Wait for it */
- wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
+ /*
+ * Wait for it. Note: on dynticks RCU completion needs to be
+ * polled frequently, to make sure we finish work. If this CPU
+ * goes idle then another CPU cannot finish this CPU's work.
+ */
+ while (wait_for_completion_timeout(&rcu.completion, HZ/100 ? : 1) == 0)
+ /* nothing */;
}
static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists