[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702061907.40920.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:07:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, akuster@...sta.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] PM: Adds remount fs ro at suspend
On Tuesday, 6 February 2007 15:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Why do you think remounting filesystems is necessary? Are you getting
> > problems with some particular filesystem?
>
> No. But anything in a removable device neets to be either remounted
> read-only or unmounted if that is at all possible, because the user could
> unplug it. It is of course, sync'd anyway, so if the remount/umount fails,
> no corruption should happen... but the fs will be dirty, etc.
>
> It can get very ugly when you factor in docks and removable bays. It's not
> just USB/firewire mass-storage devices and memory cards. And there is the
> patological cases where the user suspends with the device in one port, and
> resumes with the device in another port.
>
> I feel userspace *can* do all that needs to be done, but we are (currently)
> very bad at it.
Agreed, but still I think that we should try to solve these problems in user
space and only _after_ it turns out to be impossible or too hard to do we can
start to implement such things on the kernel side.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists