[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206194626.5a8f47ab@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:46:26 +0000
From: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
drzeus-wbsd@...eus.cx, wbsd-devel@...t.drzeus.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: shut up the IRQ mismatch messages (Re: wbsd:
IRQ handler type mismatch)
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> >
> > --- linux.vanilla-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-01-31 14:20:43.000000000 +0000
> > +++ linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/irq/manage.c 2007-02-06 11:01:00.796928504 +0000
> > @@ -372,12 +372,14 @@
> > return 0;
> >
> > mismatch:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
> > if (!(new->flags & IRQF_PROBE_SHARED)) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ %d\n", irq);
> > if (old_name)
> > printk(KERN_ERR "current handler: %s\n", old_name);
> > dump_stack();
> > }
> > +#endif
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
>
> hm, well, it's dependent upon dwmw2's
> generate-a-spurious-irq-at-request_irq-time patch. Do we want to merge
> that?
CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ seemed to be the right configuration option
irrespective of whether we merge Dave's spurious irq tester (which I
think is actually a good test tool)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists