| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1170793206.3785.16.camel@chaos> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:20:06 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: dwalker@...sta.com Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:55 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > > What kind of artificial problem are you creating here ? > > I'm not trying to create anything .. However, as I said before > the /proc/interrupts "timer" entry doesn't work the same as it has in > other kernels. Yes, it is different. Why are you insisting, that something is a problem just because it is different ? > If you think that isn't a problem then explain why .. Simply because it works and it does not make any sense to have a per cpu timer (lapic) and the PIT firing at the same periodic interval. PIT does nothing else than jiffies64++. The clockevents code just optimizes that away and lets one cpu do the jiffies64++ in its periodic per cpu interrupt. So where is the problem ? > > > We could just remove the timer entry . > > > > No we can't. The timer interrupt is setup and it does not go away, as we > > keep the PIT as a backup for the broken lapics. > > Ok, how about adding the interrupts to the list which are driving the > timer ? Uurg. /proc/interrupts has nothing to do with timers. It's interrupts statistics. See LOC entry for the lapic ones. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists