[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206210959.GC25430@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:09:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> > it's quite easy to explain: because of the new dynticks feature.
> > Both 'timer' and 'LOC' counts go way down.
>
> I don't have that enabled tho .. This is with HRT/dynamic tick both
> off..
your kernel utilizes the kernelin a more optimal way: the new
clockevents code now utilizes the local APIC timer irq (represented by
the LOC field) for periodic interrupts. The local APIC timer irq has a
cost of ~2 usecs per IRQ, while the PIT irq is ~10 usecs per irq. With
HZ=1000 this means savings of ~8000 usecs per second - i.e. 8 msecs per
second, which is 0.8% more raw CPU power available - which isnt that
bad.
we could make this clearer by renaming 'LOC' (which stands for 'LOCal
timer interupts' and was added [and misnamed] by yours truly many moons
ago) to 'apic-timer' and 'timer' to 'PIT-timer' but /that/ would be more
of a userspace visible change than the change in the counter rates.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists