[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070206.133140.91442326.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:31:40 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: kent.overstreet@...il.com, davidel@...ilserver.org,
zach.brown@...cle.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org, suparna@...ibm.com, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:28:34 -0800 (PST)
> Yeah, in 1% of all cases it will block, and you'll want to wait for them.
> Maybe the kevent queue works then, but if it needs any more setup than the
> nonblocking case, that's a big no.
So the idea is to just run it to completion if it won't block and use
a fibril if it would?
kevent could support something like that too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists