linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86-64 ext2/ext3 datestamp problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:49:26 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Markus Rechberger <markus.rechberger@....com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86-64 ext2/ext3 datestamp problem

Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> there is an issue with ext2/ext3 date stamps, if someone creates a file
> with a timestamp between 1902 and 1970(epoch 0) it will overflow and
> result in a higher date than 2038.
> 
> $ touch --date "1905-01-01" test
> $ ls -lah test
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan  1  1905 test (this is a cached value here)
> (remount the partition/clear the cache)
> $ ls -lah test
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb  6  2041 test
> 
> 10000101101111001100011001110000 .. -2051226000 (1905)
> 10000101101111001100011001110000 .. 2243741296 (2041)
> 
> this was tested against linus git tree
> 

I believe the timestamp fields in ext2/ext3 are defined as unsigned.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/