[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206222523.GA11602@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:25:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com>,
Luigi Genoni <luigi.genoni@...elli.com>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 irq: Handle irqs pending in IRR during irq migration.
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Ingo would it be reasonable to get a wait queue so I can wait for an
> irq that needs the delayed disable action to actually become masked?
that might make sense, but what will do the wakeup - incidental IRQ
arriving on the new CPU? Isnt that a bit risky - maybe the device wont
generate IRQs for a really long time.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists