[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206225650.GA14853@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:56:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 23:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > sorry but that's precisely what your suggestion above results in:
>
> I'm not trying to suggest we "fake" anything. Your just
> misunderstanding me.. [...]
as i pointed it out in the previous mail, the problem is that what you
suggested results in preisely that - a count in the wrong place:
> If we change the current "timer" entry to be listed as "lapic-timer"
> and not "IO-APIC-edge" (or one of the other names) and replace it with
> the count from LOC
changing the current 'timer' entry (which is line 2 of /proc/interrupts)
to be 'listed as lapic-timer' and to 'replace it with the count from
LOC' is faking a count in a line where nothing like that should be.
the kernel simply displays reality: IRQ#0 isnt increasing because it's
not used, and LOC (local apic timers) is increasing.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists