[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070206233016.GA108@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 02:30:16 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: make cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() work on idle dwork
cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(dwork) will hang forever if dwork was not
scheduled, because in that case cancel_delayed_work()->del_timer_sync() never
returns true.
I don't know if there are any callers which may have problems, but this is
not so convenient, and the fix is very simple.
Q: looks like we don't need "struct workqueue_struct *wq" parameter. If the
timer was aborted successfully, get_wq_data() == wq. Is it worth to add the
new function?
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/workqueue.c~3_cdw 2007-02-06 23:09:34.000000000 +0300
+++ 6.20-rc6-mm3/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-02-06 23:42:43.000000000 +0300
@@ -565,6 +565,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flush_work_keventd);
void cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct delayed_work *dwork)
{
+ /* Was it ever queued ? */
+ if (!get_wq_data(&dwork->work))
+ return;
+
while (!cancel_delayed_work(dwork))
flush_workqueue(wq);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists