| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:37:45 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote: > > > > the kernel simply displays reality: IRQ#0 isnt increasing > > > > because it's not used, and LOC (local apic timers) is > > > > increasing. > > > > > > What about the statistics for the other interrupts in the system ? > > > It clearly doesn't list all interrupts in the system . > > > > what is your point? > > Isn't the listing inconsistent ? /proc/interrupts only showing some > special interrupts, and not others .. For example it shows NMI which > is not related to request_irq() .. It shows some clock driver devices > (timer, NMI, LOC) and not others (clock event devices) .. it's not inconsistent. /proc/interrupts lists registered interrupts plus some special hardcoded platform interrupts that are not explicitly registered - with the goal of providing a list of all active interrupt sources. /proc/interrupts has been doing that for more than 10 years. Clock event devices themselves are not 'interrupt lines', why should they be listed in /proc/interrupts? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists