lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C9145E.7080800@vmware.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:50:54 -0800
From:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] Sched clock paravirt op

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>   
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>     
>>> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> Scheduled (or available) time and real time are good notions.  Stolen
>>>> time is debatable.  But TSC is basically just always wrong.  That's
>>>> why I don't want to overload the rdtsc operation.     
>>>>         
>>> Well, in the Xen case it is actually guaranteed to be correct and useful
>>> as real time, but that's definitely not something we can expect in
>>> general.  But you're talking specifically about schedulable vcpu time
>>> here, right?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Not schedulable time, scheduled time (schedulable - scheduled) = stolen
>>     
>
> I meant "schedulable" (perhaps "usable" would be better) from the
> guest's perspective: total amount of real cpu time each vcpu gets.  ie:
> (real - schedulable) = stolen.  So I think we're talking about the same
> thing.
>   

Yes, I think so.  The point though, is the for Xen, TSC is real time.  
So it won't do for the scheduler, which must be schedulable time.

Zach

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ