[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73abzqmfpq.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: 07 Feb 2007 11:20:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
clameter@...r.sgi.com, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> writes:
>
> Would it be possible to attach the cpus to the
> next nodes with memory and mark the node offline? That way we could avoid
> another mask that we constantly have to check?
That is what x86-64 does and I believe is the right solution to this.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists