[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C9A666.7010703@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:13:58 +0100
From: John <linux.kernel@...e.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...esys.com, johnstul@...ibm.com,
akpm@...l.org, linux.kernel@...e.fr
Subject: Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> 2.6.18-rt7 is pretty old, do you see the problem in 2.6.20-rc6-rt5 too?
>>
>> Ingo, Thomas,
>>
>> I cannot reproduce in 2.6.20-rc6-rt6, but it is not strictly an
>> apples-to-apples comparison because I get a tsc clocksource in
>> 2.6.20-rc6-rt6, and an acpi_pm clocksource in 2.6.18.6-rt7.
>
> That suggests that the TSC was not deemed reliable by the newer kernel,
> which almost always means it's not realiable. I think the problems you
> were seeing are consistent with TSC being non-monotonic - so the fix is
> to not use the TSC - and the newer kernel does this automatically.
Ingo,
Perhaps you've mis-read my message?
*2.6.18.6-rt7* installed an acpi_pm clocksource. When I used a boot
parameter to force the clocksource to tsc, the high-resolution timer
infrastructure broke (timers expired several *ms* too late).
On the other hand, *2.6.20-rc6-rt6* and *2.6.20-rt2* both installed a
tsc clock source, and it works.
Therefore, it is not the newer kernel that ignored the tsc, but the
older kernel. Thus I don't know what to make of your comment :-)
Regards,
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists