linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070207110519.GA5361@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:05:19 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@....de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revokeat/frevoke system calls V5

On Wed 07-02-07 12:50:34, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi Honza,
> 
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   Have you considered using similar hack as bad_inode.c instead of
> > revoked_inode.c?
> 
> I am not sure what you mean, revoked_inode.c looks pretty much the same as 
> bad_inode.c in mainline...
  Oops, sorry for confusion. I was looking into 2.6.19 and there the code
looks differently. In 2.6.20, obviously your method was preferred.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/