linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/28] Patches to pass vfsmount to LSM inode security hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070207121125.GA15989@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:11:25 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/28] Patches to pass vfsmount to LSM inode security hooks

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:58:15AM -0800, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > It's not actually a pathname we care about, but a vfsmount + dentry
> > combo.  That one means as much in nfsd as elsewhere.  We want nfsd
> > to obey r/o or noatime mount flags if /export/foo is exported with them
> > but /foo not.
> 
> This assumes that you can discover from the file handle which export it 
> belongs to. And right, this can be done using the fsid export option. Okay, 
> I'm now convinced that passing the vfsmounts from the svc_export to the vfs_ 
> helpers is good at least for *something*. I'll update the patches.

As I mentioned before I have a big patchset reworking this area, so please
wait a week or two for me two finish it instead of creating lots of rejects.

> > This doesn't matter.  hardlinks are per definition on the same vfsmount.
> 
> Hardlinks are per definition on the same filesystem. This doesn't mean that 
> you can't have two filehandles for the same file but with different 
> vfsmounts -- you can have the same file visible in multiple locations, each 
> with their own vfsmount.

Sure, but that doesn't matter here.  Exports are per-vfsmount, and
each export has the vfsmount stored in it.  So we know which of the
vfsmount we want before we even resolve the dentry.  And yes, if
I have /export/foo mounted with option but /foo now I want those
options to apply to the nfs export.  Note that we actually have another
little bug in this area currently:  if you export two different
patch that have the same underlying filesystems they actually do get
the same file handle unless using fsid=.  We probably need to put
a check into svc_export_parse so that we don't export the same
device twice without using fsid=.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/