[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45C9C8BF.6030501@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:40:31 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: conke.hu@....com
CC: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error
Conke Hu wrote:
> Hi,
> TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or
> see below) always returns error.
>
> ---------------- code begin -----------------------------
> retries = 0;
> do {
> memset((void *)cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
> cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY;
>
> the_result = scsi_execute_req (cd->device, cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL,
> 0, &sshdr, SR_TIMEOUT,
> MAX_RETRIES);
>
> retries++;
> } while (retries < 5 &&
> (!scsi_status_is_good(the_result) ||
> (scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr) &&
> sshdr.sense_key == UNIT_ATTENTION)));
> ---------------- code end -----------------------------
>
> I debugged all kernel versions from 2.6.17 to 2.6.20 on several AMD
> and other vendor's PATA/IDE controllers, and I get the_result==0x8000002
> and retries==5; on silicon image 3132, i get the_result=0x2eb.
> Does 0x8000002 mean ((DRIVER_SENSE << 24) | SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION)?
> what's wrong?
What does the sense data returned in the sense buffer say is wrong?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists