linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: warrning fix: unsigned->signed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5157576d0702062131u3365881bw87a29eaabac69c40@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:31:20 +0300
From:	"Tomasz Kvarsin" <kvarsin@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, axboe@...nel.dk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: warrning fix: unsigned->signed

I uses gcc "trunk" with -Wconversion,
 because of they finaly implement warrning for such things:
uint16_t a;
uint8_t b;
b = a;
see
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/NewWconversion

On 2/7/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:39:45 +0300
> "Tomasz Kvarsin" <kvarsin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > While compiling my code, I always get bunch of warrning from headers,
> > here is fix for them:
> > __getblk is alawys called with unsigned argument,
> > but it takes signed, the same story with __bread,__breadahead and so on.
>
> The patch seems OK, but I'm curious to know why you're seeing this warning
> and nobody else is.  Are you using a compiler other than gcc?  If gcc,
> which version?  Did you add any new compiler options?
>
> Thanks.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/