[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070208095612.GA9977@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:56:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lukasz Trabinski <lukasz@...siz.edu.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski <solarz@...siz.edu.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
* Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> This reminds me the current problem in close_files()
> code, where we trigger soft lockup quite regularly.
>
> Is there any chance/interest we can solve the issue Andrew had with
> this patch ?
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/2/273
yes - the -rt patch included the patch below for more than 2 years.
(note that this one is even more finegrained)
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux/kernel/exit.c
@@ -431,8 +433,10 @@ static void close_files(struct files_str
while (set) {
if (set & 1) {
struct file * file = xchg(&fdt->fd[i], NULL);
- if (file)
+ if (file) {
filp_close(file, files);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
}
i++;
set >>= 1;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists