[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0702080628u5038191dm74139a7dd7bff909@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:28:03 -0500
From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: "Oleg Verych" <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> wrote:
> proposition is to substitute:
> "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
> with
> "mkimage"
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
mkimage-missing scenario ...
with mkuboot.sh you'd get output like:
...
UIMAGE arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage
"mkimage" command not found - U-Boot images will not be built
Building modules, stage 2.
...
with mkimage you'd get output like:
...
UIMAGE arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage
/bin/sh: mkimage: command not found
make[1]: *** [arch/blackfin/boot/vmImage] Error 127
make: *** [vmImage] Error 2
so while you could change all the Makefile's to insert - to ignore
*all* failures, without the script, you loose the ability to only
ignore "binary missing" errors
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists