[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702081851310.1364@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:42:07 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb
On Feb 8 2007 08:33, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>And the thing is, sometimes -Wpointer-sign-compare is just horribly
>broken. For example, you cannot write a "strlen()" that doesn't
>complain about "unsigned char *" vs "char *". And that is just a BUG.
>
>I'm continually amazed at how totally clueless some gcc warnings are.
>You'd think that the people writing them are competent. And then
>sometimes they show just how totally incompetent they are, by making it
>impossible to use "unsigned char" arrays together with standard
>functions.
I generally have to agree with you about the unsigned char* vs char*. It
is a problem of the C language that char can be signed and unsigned, and
that people, as a result, have used it for storing
"shorter_than_short_t"s.
What C needs is a distinction between char and int8_t, rendering "char"
an unsigned at all times basically and making "unsigned char" and
"signed char" illegal types in turn.
Jan
--
ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists