linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ATA convert GSI to irq on ia64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070208122539.d9c24ad9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:25:39 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA convert GSI to irq on ia64

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:42:04 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:40:22PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > If an ATA drive uses legacy mode, ata driver will choose 14 and 15 as the
> > fixed irq number. On ia64 platform, such numbers are GSI and should be converted
> > to irq vector.
> > 
> > Below patch against kernel 2.6.20 fixes it.
> 
> These direct arch ifdefs in core aren't acceptable.

For 2.6.21 that's true.  But this is a suitable fix for 2.6.20.x, no?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/