[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070208124629.c9c2c09d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:46:29 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA convert GSI to irq on ia64
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:34:53 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:25:39PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:42:04 +0000
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:40:22PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > > If an ATA drive uses legacy mode, ata driver will choose 14 and 15 as the
> > > > fixed irq number. On ia64 platform, such numbers are GSI and should be converted
> > > > to irq vector.
> > > >
> > > > Below patch against kernel 2.6.20 fixes it.
> > >
> > > These direct arch ifdefs in core aren't acceptable.
> >
> > For 2.6.21 that's true. But this is a suitable fix for 2.6.20.x, no?
>
> Just putting in an #ifndef and allow to to set it up in asm/ata.h
> is almost as trivial and a lot nice conceptually.
Well if that's what the 2.6.21 solution looks like then OK. Would want to
see the patch though.
> Then again
> what happened to the idea of putting fixes into mainline before
> -stable?
If the preferred mainline patch involves a lot of not-really-needed
restructuring then an alternative short-but-obvious fix for -stable is
sometimes more appropriate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists