[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15804.1170975519@neuling.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:58:39 +1100
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To: Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] free initrds boot option
In message <20070208123537.GB7304@...ge.net.au> you wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:35:08AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:32:15AM +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > > >Is there a kexec-tools patch too? How does second kernel know about
> > > > >the location of the first kernel's initrd to be reused?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > kexec-tools has to be modified to pass the first kernel initrd. On
> > > > powerpc, initrd locations are exported using device-tree. At present,
> > > > kexec-tool ignores the first kernel initrd property values and creates
> > > > new initrd properties if the user passes '--initrd' option to the kexec
> > > > command. So, will be an issue unless first kernel device-tree is passed
> > > > as buffer.
> > >
> > > We've been using the --devicetreeblob kexec-tools option available for
> > > POWERPC. This enables you to setup the device tree (and hence, the
> > > initrd points) as you like.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to put together a patch for kexec-tools.
> >
> > Please do. And please cc me on a copy that applies against kexec-tools-test
ing.
> >
> > > Unfortunately this
> > > is arch specific. A quick look through the x86, ia64, s390 and ppc64
> > > code shows the --initrd option for all these just reads the specified
> > > initrd file, pushes it out to memory and uses the base and size pointers
> > > to setup the next boot. We'd obviously just skip to the last stage.
> > >
> > > So what's the kexec-tools option called? --initrd-location <base> <size>
?
> >
> > That sounds fine to me. I think its ok to make it arch specific for
> > starters and then move it out to generic code later. That said, if
> > you're feeling particularly entergetic, feel free to do the generic
> > stuff now and just add null stubs for the other architectures (does
> > that makes sense?).
>
> Did anything ever come of this?
Not yet, but it's on my todo list.
Mikey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists