linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [IA64] Include kexec.h in arch/ia64/kernel/process.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070207192735.2d06e984.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:27:35 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
	"Zou, Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@...el.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid_aziz@...com>,
	Adrian Bunk <trivial@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IA64] Include kexec.h in arch/ia64/kernel/process.c

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:19:03 +0900 Horms wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:07:40AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > kexec.h is needed by arch/ia64/kernel/process.c so for the
> > > declaration of kexec_disable_iosapic() which is used in
> > > machine_shutdown().
> > 
> > > +#include <asm/kexec.h>
> > 
> > I merged this into your earlier change (moving machine_shutdown() into
> > process.c).  Linus pulled it last night.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> > I also added a "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC" around the call to
> > kexec_disable_iosapic() (because I first noticed that this was
> > undefined when building non-KEXEC kernels).  But perhaps it might have
> > been better to #define an empty stub for this function inside kexec.h
> > for the #ifndef CONFIG_KEXEC case?
> 
> Good catch :)

uh, every one of Andrew's commit emails now contains the line
at the end of my mail sig...  Try it sometimes^W often.


> I think that #define in the process.c vs an empty stub inside
> asm/kexec.h is really a style issue. I'm quite ok with things
> the way they are. But If you are more comfortable with the stub
> approach, I have no objections.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/